R. v. C.E. et al
(Alta. Q. B. ). C. E. was charged with break and enter with intent to commit robbery (home invasion) and theft.
Calgary Criminal Lawyers
CASES
(403) 452-8018
Some Cases handled by Calgary Criminal Lawyer, David Chow
Cases presented here are only some of the cases handled by David Chow. All cases use lettering to protect the identity of the client for solicitor-client privilege purposes. The case lettering does not necessarily reflect the client's actual initials. David has successfully defended many clients not represented here. Case results are updated periodically and thus are not necessarily up-to-date.
A good reason to review the posted cases handled by David Chow is to learn some legal principles about an actual case and how that particular case was handled.
R. v. L.B.
(Lethbridge, A. C. A. -- Robbery). LB was convicted at trial for robbing a convenience store. He hired David Chow to appeal the case.
R. v. A.H.K.
(Alberta P. C. - DUI/Breach of Recognizance) – AHK was charged with impaired driving, over 80 and a breach of recognizance.
R. v. P.M.
(Calgary, Q. B. - Impaired Driving). Client was convicted at trial of operating a motor vehicle with a blood-alcohol level exceeding the legal limit.
R. v. R.O.
(Calgary, P. C. - Assault Police Officer). In this case, the client was charged with assaulting a peace officer, resisting arrest, simple assault, uttering threats and mischief.
R. v. M.C.
(Calgary - Impaired Driving/Over 80). Client was charged with impaired driving and operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration exceeding the legal limit.
R. v. T.R.
(Calgary, P. C. -- Refusing to blow/DUI) – This client was charged with impaired driving and refusing to supply a breath sample.
R. v. T.L.
Client was charged with criminal harassment and breaching bail conditions. Defence counsel successfully argued for a conditional discharge.
R. v. C.N.
Client was charged with numerous firearms related offences along with a number of co-accused. Crown sought the client's detention on the secondary and tertiary grounds.
R. v. S.L.
Client’s case was taken over from another lawyer at preliminary inquiry. The client was in custody.
R. v. O.M.
Client was charged with breaching bail while on release for drug charges and allegations of violence.
R. v. C.M.
Client was charged with impaired driving and over 80. He was acquitted at trial due to a lack of police reasonable grounds to arrest.
R. v. F.M.
Client was charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking cocaine. He was acquitted at trial.
R. v. R.I.
Client was charged with assault causing bodily harm to a child. The client was acquitted after trial.
R. v. R.I.
Client was charged with assault causing bodily harm to a child. The client was acquitted after trial.
R. v. C.W.B.
A. J. 696 (Alta. Q. B. ) – Client was charged with first degree murder in a homicide involving a firearm.
R. v. M.O.
Client was charged with assault and mischief in a road rage incident. The client was offered a conditional discharge mid-trial and accepted.
R. v. V.S.
[2009] - Client was charged with 4 counts of trafficking to an undercover police officer, possession for the purpose of trafficking and possession of the proceeds of crime.
R. v. K.F.C.
Client was charged with sexual assault. After conviction, defence counsel successfully applied for a mistrial. The charges were ultimately stayed against the client.