Home
Alberta Roadside Sanctions Lawyer
Practice Areas
Calgary Drug Offences
Domestic Violence
Impaired Driving/DUI
Criminal Driving Offences
Homicide
Assault
Uttering Threats
Break and Enter / Home Invasion
Robbery
Theft / Fraud / Property Offences
Firearms Offences
Internet Crime
Judicial Interim Release/Bail
Conspiracy
Kidnapping / Unlawful Confinement
Sexual Assault
Perjury
Causing a Disturbance
Mischief
Public Mischief
Escape Lawful Custody | Unlawfully at Large
COVID-19 Offences
Roadside Sanctions
About
The DNA of a Criminal Defence Lawyer
Calgary criminal lawyer fees
Philosophy
Top 5
Cases
Defences
Identification
Continuity
Alibi
Possession
Incriminating Answers
Entrapment
Alternative Measures
Duress
Self Defence
Motive
Immunity Agreements
Jurisdiction of the Court | Loss of Jurisdiction
Choosing Wisely
Reasonable Diligence
Former Crown Prosecutor
Dedicated Practice
Managing a Criminal Case
Choosing Wisely
Prioritzation
Hire the right defence lawyer the first time
Testimonials
Free Consult
Blog
Contact DUI Lawyer David Chow for a Free Consultation
Testimonials
Free Consult
Blog
Home
Practice Areas
Calgary Drug Offences
Domestic Violence
Impaired Driving/DUI
Criminal Driving Offences
Homicide
Assault
Uttering Threats
Break and Enter / Home Invasion
Robbery
Theft / Fraud / Property Offences
Firearms Offences
Internet Crime
Judicial Interim Release/Bail
Conspiracy
Kidnapping / Unlawful Confinement
Sexual Assault
Perjury
Causing a Disturbance
Mischief
Public Mischief
Escape Lawful Custody | Unlawfully at Large
COVID-19 Offences
Roadside Sanctions
About
Cases
Defences
Identification
Continuity
Alibi
Possession
Incriminating Answers
Entrapment
Alternative Measures
Duress
Self Defence
Motive
Immunity Agreements
Jurisdiction of the Court | Loss of Jurisdiction
Choosing Wisely
Reasonable Diligence
Former Crown Prosecutor
Dedicated Practice
Managing a Criminal Case
Choosing Wisely
Prioritzation
Hire the right defence lawyer the first time
R. v. C.D.A.
(403) 452-8018
R. v. C.D.A.
November 12, 2009
Client plead not guilty to fraud and resisting arrest. He was acquitted at trial.
< Previous Post
R. v. S.L.
Next Post >
R. v. C.N.