R. v. A.D.
R. v. A.D.
(Calgary, P.C.). AD was charged with various fraud offences, including fraud over $5000, fraud under $5000, possession of fraudulent identification documents and impersonation. The incidents alleged opening a fake bank account, accessing accounts and transferring money. The accused was in serious jeopardy. She had no prior criminal record. The Crown and Defence counsel worked closely to fully evaluate the case. There were identification issues, coupled by legitimate concerns as to whether the accused was the principle offender. The accused had immigration issues that if convicted of certain charges, she could have faced automatic deportation notwithstanding her many years in Canada. At the end of the day, the defence and crown crafted an appropriate disposition that focussed on the allegations the Crown obvious evidence, while at the same time keeping the accused out of jail and protecting her immigration status. This case is important because it highlights that defending criminal cases involves a variety of different considerations. In light of amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), mitigating immigration consequences can take primacy when defending against a criminal prosecution. Though David Chow is a Calgary criminal lawyer and not an Alberta immigration lawyer, he understands that it is sill important to have a working understanding of immigration issues. Anybody who is not a Canadian citizen who is facing immigration issues should always consult with a qualified Calgary immigration lawyer. David Chow is one of many experienced Calgary criminal lawyers who offers a free consultation. He is not only a Calgary fraud lawyer, he is an impaired driving lawyer, a Calgary drug lawyer and Calgary defence lawyer who handles all domestic violence cases. If you have been charged, call 403.452.8018.