R. v. J.D.K.
R. v. J.D.K.
(Calgary, P.C.). JDK's case is another example where the Crown was prepared to appropriately exercise its discretion in the public interests. Many are not aware that in any prosecution, the Crown must answer two questions: (1) reasonable prospect of conviction and (2) public interest. Reasonable prospect of conviction asks whether the evidence is notionally sufficient to support a verdict of guilty. Public interest questions whether it is in society's interest to prosecute at all. JDK was charged with blowing at the legal limit; meaning that his BAC was "at 80". JDK was cooperative with the police and had no prior issues. He displayed no other indicia of impairment or bad driving. JDK suffered employed consequences outside of the criminal justice system. David Chow pleaded with the Crown on JDK's behalf to stay the case. Acting in the public interest, the Crown ultimately exercised its discretion favourably -- something that often happens in Calgary. If you have been charged with a DUI, there are impaired driving lawyers in Calgary and throughout Alberta who can help. Sometimes we can bring about favourable outcomes without having a costly trial. Call David Chow for a free DUI consultation at 403.452.8018.