R. v. G.T.

(Calgary, P.C. - Importation/PPT). GT was charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking and importation of dozens of kilograms of meth and cocaine.  GT was found "not guilty" at trial. This was a multi-kilo drug case that could have had very serious consequences for GT. The trial defences integrated a number of issues, including identification, continuity and the use of circumstantial evidence. The trial judge thoroughly and properly applied the Supreme Court of Canada decision, R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 in arriving at the verdict -- "not guilty".  GT's case was one involving a number of investigative techniques, including covert surveillance and forensic technological analysis. David Chow understands there are a number of quality Calgary drug lawyers to choose from. Though there are many Calgary criminal lawyers, not every criminal defence lawyer can properly defend a drug case. GT's situation is another case where David Chow was very grateful to have earned the trust and confidence of his client. Though the principle of Occam's Razor is generally advisable in criminal law cases, sometimes the defence has no other option but to defend the case at trial. Charged with a drug offence? Don't settle for just any lawyer; rather, be duly diligent by interviewing lawyers, doing your research and using your good sense. Your choice of drug lawyer could mean the difference between being found guilty or not - going to jail or not.